You could practically hear the screaming echoing through Google HQ the second the rumors dropped: OpenAI was quietly building a Chrome rival. The AI startup Google used to think was cute… is now trying to take over the whole damn house. And to make it worse? The attack was aimed at Google’s most prized possession… Chrome. Their digital beachfront property. The part of the internet where all the ad money lives (as we talked about last week).
So Google did what any paranoid tech monopoly would do when their territory gets challenged: they flipped the switch from “friendly rival” to “we will eat your f!@#ing lunch.” At the same time, OpenAI was busy trying to lock down Windsurf… the hot new AI dev startup with real revenue, real users, and a waitlist that probably included half of GitHub. They’d offered $3 billion and thought they had it in the bag. But behind the scenes, the wheels were starting to wobble. The deal wasn’t dead, but it was definitely coughing. Terms dragged. Meetings stalled. And OpenAI started getting that sinking feeling… like when your Uber app suddenly says “Looking for driver” after confirming one five minutes ago.
And right about then, in walked Google’s DeepMind. Cool, calm, holding a vanilla latte and a check for $2.4 billion. Not to buy the company (no, that would’ve triggered every antitrust flare in Washington) but to license Windsurf’s tech and hire the key players before OpenAI could even hit refresh. It was smooth. Surgical. Almost rude. So, let’s break down how Google pulled this off… and how OpenAI fumbled a bag this big.
For context… Windsurf wasn’t your typical “AI-powered but still living on vibes and seed money” startup. These guys were the real deal. They were shipping legit products… enterprise-grade dev tools that helped engineers (and let’s be honest, product managers who haven’t touched code since the Obama administration) write, test, and deploy software with AI. And most importantly, it actually worked. It was fast, the UI didn’t make you want to throw your laptop, and devs were genuinely hyped about it. Which, if you know developers, is rarer than a bug-free launch.
By April, Windsurf’s ARR had surged to $100 million… more than doubling from $40 million just a few months earlier. And as we all know, in Techland, that kind of growth turns heads (and more importantly) sets off bidding wars. And OpenAI, already competing with Anthropic, Microsoft, and pretty much every startup with a .ai domain, saw Windsurf as a must-have. So they offered $3 billion and entered exclusivity talks earlier this year.
And that’s when things got complicated. The thing is (despite what Sammie boy tells you) OpenAI isn’t exactly independent. Microsoft (their biggest investor and infrastructure partner) has commercial rights to basically everything OpenAI builds. Azure powers the models. Microsoft bakes GPT into Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Teams… you name it. So if OpenAI bought Windsurf, Microsoft would almost certainly benefit, too. Apparently, that was the dealbreaker. OpenAI wasn’t exactly thrilled about handing Microsoft yet another strategic weapon… especially one that could be plugged straight into GitHub Copilot and the rest of their developer stack. Talks started to stall. Then the exclusivity window lapsed… and Windsurf was officially back on the market. That’s when Google pounced.
You see, rather than attempt a full acquisition (which would’ve triggered a regulatory “office lookaround” and added one more file to the DOJ’s “Big Tech, Big Problems” folder) Google played it smart. They pulled off a reverse-acquihire. Which means, instead of buying the company, they hired the most important people (CEO Varun Mohan, cofounder Douglas Chen, and key engineers) and paid $2.4 billion to license Windsurf’s core technology. There was no equity involved, no acquisition legal paperwork, no drawn-out approval process. Just the product and the people.
That team is now heading to DeepMind to work on Gemini, Google’s flagship LLM, and specifically its push into “agentic coding.” In plain English, that’s the idea of AI writing, running, and improving code in a continuous loop… like a software engineer who never eats, sleeps, or files a PTO request. It’s the next frontier of developer tooling, and Google wants to lead that race before OpenAI gets there first.
Google’s spokesperson, Chris Pappas, kept it polite, saying they’re “excited to welcome some top AI coding talent from Windsurf’s team.” (But… internally, they’re probably printing “We beat OpenAI” shirts and passing them around at the DeepMind office.)
So what happens to Windsurf? Most of their 250-person team is staying. Jeff Wang, the company’s former head of business, is stepping in as interim CEO. They’ll continue offering their AI coding tools to enterprise clients… just without the original leadership or core engineering brainpower. And if the history of Big Tech poaching tells us anything (hi, Inflection and Scale AI), that kind of brain drain is hard to bounce back from.
As for OpenAI, they’re likely already hunting for their next target. Cursor’s name has been floating around for weeks. Or maybe they’re drafting one of those awkward “we’re still rooting for you” DMs to the remaining Windsurf team. You know, just in case.
But here’s the bigger takeaway: This wasn’t just a failed deal. It was a case study in how the AI arms race is shifting. It’s no longer just about model size or GPU access. It’s about recruiting the right people… and doing it fast, before your rival does. Not only was Google able to block OpenAI from gaining an edge. But they were able to extract Windsurf’s value, repurpose it for Gemini, and avoid the regulatory mess completely.
At the time of publishing this article, Stocks.News holds positions in Google and Microsoft as mentioned in the article.
Did you find this insightful?
Bad
Just Okay
Amazing
Disclaimer: Information provided is for informational purposes only, not investment advice. We do not recommend buying or selling stocks. Stock price discussions are based on publicly available data. Readers should conduct their own research or consult a financial advisor before investing. Owners of this site have current positions in stocks mentioned thru out the site, Please Read Full Disclaimer for details Here https://app.stocks.news/page/disclaimer