All Tweet

@klos Bitcoin and global M2 have solid correlation, and importantly the mechanism behind it makes sense, but I don't agree with people who put the two together on a chart and say "look M2 went up, therefore bitcoin's going up over the next few months too." It's not assured like that.

Mentioned on : 06/29/2025

Bitcoin is the result of technology improving. People were working on distributed ledgers since at least the 1980s (e.g. Chaum), and all the pieces came together about as early as they could have (once bandwidth was decent enough, once the encryption for it existed, etc). Onto the other part: people invest in high-ROI opportunities in all sorts of environments. Bitcoin is rapidly appreciating, yet I'm still interested in investing companies building on that appreciating money. In an environment where bitcoin "is" the money, then it's already widely adopted, appreciating much more slowly, thus further encouraging me to invest it or lend it if I want a better return. Just like always. It's not a fundamental re-write of human nature; it mainly just affects whether arbitrage debt exists at scale or not, and affects some of the mechanics of how things work under the hood.

Mentioned on : 06/21/2025

@BTCsessions @TeamYouTube Hey @TeamYouTube, banning BTC Sessions is totally the wrong move. He has some of the best educational content out there.

Mentioned on : 06/26/2025

@TXMCtrades @HodlMagoo @USDC @Tether_to @Visa @netflix @blockbuster Visa and Mastercard don’t provide any credit. The card-issuing banks that use the networks provide the credit. American Express and Discover are different; they are vertically integrated so they are also a bank on top of their (smaller) network that provide credit.

Mentioned on : 06/26/2025

@Stimpyz1 @onechancefreedm @Teddy21btc It means the size of the money supply is flexible either way. One method is having a flexible number of units, and the other is for the value of each unit to change.

Mentioned on : 06/24/2025

@assumestupidity Checking in on this. It wasn’t a rhetorical question. I’m genuinely curious to hear in what way they have negatively affected your ability to use bitcoin as money?

Mentioned on : 06/24/2025

@Stimpyz1 @Teddy21btc What you spend doesn't necessarily affect what you hold, if you're regularly acquiring more. Sometimes it's just more convenient to spend bitcoin than fiat. That doesn't conflict with viewing bitcoin as an ideal asset to hold.

Mentioned on : 06/24/2025

@assumestupidity You said between Saylor and Blackrock, Bitcoin has “lost” what you hoped it would be. Now you say it was never a possible option and they just proved it. Which is it, then?

Mentioned on : 06/24/2025

@Stimpyz1 @Teddy21btc Bitcoin makes payments easier and cheaper in many contexts. So yes, I think it would be a productivity boost to minimize the tax burden, and I'm supportive of legislation that does that (starting with small amounts realistically, although larger numbers would be nice).

Mentioned on : 06/24/2025

@EricBalchunas Bitcoin is in a good place currently.

Mentioned on : 06/23/2025

"Independently of any gains in production". If gains in production are happening, then what's the problem? If people are saving more money, then they're selling something else, lowering the price of those things. In a system where a deflationary money is already ubiquitously adopted, there's a ceiling on how much it can appreciate in a period of time, since it's already widely held. If people want to make strong gains, they need to go out and work, or need to invest or lend. And I mean, for context, I'm a GP at a bitcoin venture firm. Bitcoin is up 1,051% in the past five years and yet I'm literally investing in bitcoin-related companies. Despite an insane hurdle rate I'm still investing, as are others. There's a good amount of capital available for high-quality startups in the space. Imagine if bitcoin is 20x larger, more ubiquitously held, not increasing at an insane rate anymore. There'd be a ton of things I'd rather own or lend to, than just hold slowly-appreciating money.

Mentioned on : 06/21/2025

Coinbase sent me one of the early commemorative editions of their upcoming Bitcoin rewards card. That letter that came with it, though. Well played, Coinbase. Well played.

Mentioned on : 06/16/2025

@Maseb244 @tonystyles80 I've been long gold since it was $1,300 or so (up 2.6x), and bitcoin since $6,900 (up 15x). I like both. When gold and silver fans jump into my threads and try to dunk on bitcoin, all I smell is desperation.

Mentioned on : 06/13/2025

@chadlupkes @coryklippsten @coinjunky @john_at_swan I agree. Once bitcoin is large and mature. Although it wouldn’t eliminate all debt. Just debt used for financial arbitrage, which is most of it. There will likely always be a need for short-term credit for various purposes, and that’s the healthy, smaller type of debt.

Mentioned on : 06/08/2025

@ronkusick No, because they can’t print more bitcoin, and can’t dictate who gets to hold bitcoin or not. Central bankers print money and dictate whether an entity gets to be a bank and access their base layer money or not.

Mentioned on : 06/07/2025

Given the surge of the Bitcoin conference and more broadly this entire Twitter\X’s platform’s inability to distinguish bots to you: 1) I am not on Instagram; my real accounts are listed on my site. 2) I won’t DM you with investment opportunities. Sorry.

Mentioned on : 05/27/2025

Stocks News

Recent Tweets by LynAldenContact

@klos Bitcoin and global M2 have solid correlation, and importantly the mechanism behind it makes sense, but I don't agree with people who put the two together on a chart and say "look M2 went up, therefore bitcoin's going up over the next few months too." It's not assured like that.

@BTCsessions @TeamYouTube Hey @TeamYouTube, banning BTC Sessions is totally the wrong move. He has some of the best educational content out there.

@Stimpyz1 @onechancefreedm @Teddy21btc It means the size of the money supply is flexible either way. One method is having a flexible number of units, and the other is for the value of each unit to change.

@assumestupidity Checking in on this. It wasn’t a rhetorical question. I’m genuinely curious to hear in what way they have negatively affected your ability to use bitcoin as money?

@Stimpyz1 @Teddy21btc What you spend doesn't necessarily affect what you hold, if you're regularly acquiring more. Sometimes it's just more convenient to spend bitcoin than fiat. That doesn't conflict with viewing bitcoin as an ideal asset to hold.

@assumestupidity You said between Saylor and Blackrock, Bitcoin has “lost” what you hoped it would be. Now you say it was never a possible option and they just proved it. Which is it, then?

@Stimpyz1 @Teddy21btc Bitcoin makes payments easier and cheaper in many contexts. So yes, I think it would be a productivity boost to minimize the tax burden, and I'm supportive of legislation that does that (starting with small amounts realistically, although larger numbers would be nice).

@EricBalchunas Bitcoin is in a good place currently.

Coinbase sent me one of the early commemorative editions of their upcoming Bitcoin rewards card. That letter that came with it, though. Well played, Coinbase. Well played.

@Maseb244 @tonystyles80 I've been long gold since it was $1,300 or so (up 2.6x), and bitcoin since $6,900 (up 15x). I like both. When gold and silver fans jump into my threads and try to dunk on bitcoin, all I smell is desperation.

@ronkusick No, because they can’t print more bitcoin, and can’t dictate who gets to hold bitcoin or not. Central bankers print money and dictate whether an entity gets to be a bank and access their base layer money or not.

Given the surge of the Bitcoin conference and more broadly this entire Twitter\X’s platform’s inability to distinguish bots to you: 1) I am not on Instagram; my real accounts are listed on my site. 2) I won’t DM you with investment opportunities. Sorry.

Stocks News

Recent Tweets by LynAldenContact

@klos Bitcoin and global M2 have solid correlation, and importantly the mechanism behind it makes sense, but I don't agree with people who put the two together on a chart and say "look M2 went up, therefore bitcoin's going up over the next few months too." It's not assured like that.

@BTCsessions @TeamYouTube Hey @TeamYouTube, banning BTC Sessions is totally the wrong move. He has some of the best educational content out there.

@Stimpyz1 @onechancefreedm @Teddy21btc It means the size of the money supply is flexible either way. One method is having a flexible number of units, and the other is for the value of each unit to change.

@assumestupidity Checking in on this. It wasn’t a rhetorical question. I’m genuinely curious to hear in what way they have negatively affected your ability to use bitcoin as money?

@Stimpyz1 @Teddy21btc What you spend doesn't necessarily affect what you hold, if you're regularly acquiring more. Sometimes it's just more convenient to spend bitcoin than fiat. That doesn't conflict with viewing bitcoin as an ideal asset to hold.

@assumestupidity You said between Saylor and Blackrock, Bitcoin has “lost” what you hoped it would be. Now you say it was never a possible option and they just proved it. Which is it, then?

@Stimpyz1 @Teddy21btc Bitcoin makes payments easier and cheaper in many contexts. So yes, I think it would be a productivity boost to minimize the tax burden, and I'm supportive of legislation that does that (starting with small amounts realistically, although larger numbers would be nice).

@EricBalchunas Bitcoin is in a good place currently.

Coinbase sent me one of the early commemorative editions of their upcoming Bitcoin rewards card. That letter that came with it, though. Well played, Coinbase. Well played.

@Maseb244 @tonystyles80 I've been long gold since it was $1,300 or so (up 2.6x), and bitcoin since $6,900 (up 15x). I like both. When gold and silver fans jump into my threads and try to dunk on bitcoin, all I smell is desperation.

@ronkusick No, because they can’t print more bitcoin, and can’t dictate who gets to hold bitcoin or not. Central bankers print money and dictate whether an entity gets to be a bank and access their base layer money or not.

Given the surge of the Bitcoin conference and more broadly this entire Twitter\X’s platform’s inability to distinguish bots to you: 1) I am not on Instagram; my real accounts are listed on my site. 2) I won’t DM you with investment opportunities. Sorry.

Select an alert type

Setup alert

Exclusive Content