Novo Nordisk Triggers Pricing War with Eli Lilly as Competitors Get Bulldozed by FDA…

Well, would ya look at that. Novo Nordisk just decided to play "The Price is Right" with its diabetes cash cow Wegovy. The Danish drug giant slashed prices to $499 monthly for the uninsured crowd, down from a wallet-melting $650. Its stock immediately jumped to $91.16 as investors celebrated this "generous" 23% discount on a drug that originally cost the uninsured over $1,000 per month. How nice.

Novo Nordisk

(Source: Giphy) 

In short, Novo's discount comes precisely one week after rival Eli Lilly cut prices on its competing skinny shot Zepbound. Lilly started the price war by offering its starter dose at $349 and matching Novo's $499 for higher doses. Classic pharmaceutical duopoly behavior—when one moves, the other follows with military precision.

Which means now, America's favorite drug dealers are officially locked in a strategic pricing battle for America's wallets. Both companies have launched direct-to-consumer platforms (NovoCare and LillyDirect) to deliver their appetite-suppressing gold mines straight to patients' doorsteps. PBM’s? Never heard of ‘em… 

Novo Nordisk

(Source: Giphy) 

But it gets even better, because this also comes right at the time the FDA conveniently removed both weight-loss injections from its shortage list. Competition's a b**ch. And the FDA's playing favorites. (Sorry, Hims). ICYMI, regulators ordered compounding pharmacies to stop making cheaper Wegovy copies in February, declaring the "shortage" magically over—just months after doing the same with Lilly's Zepbound in December. Compounders led by the Outsourcing Facilities Association have already sued the FDA, which tells you everything you need about who's winning this battle.

As BMO analyst Evan Seigerman noted, "both Lilly and Novo look to cut out compounding pharmacies, which have taken some of their product's sizable demand." Translation: the big players are getting their “Curtis Wright” on with regulators to eliminate their cheaper competition. 

Novo Nordisk

(Source: Giphy) 

Which in turn, brings us back to the murder victim: Telehealth platform Hims & Hers took an immediate stock hit on Wednesday's news, dropping to $38.76 as investors collectively “noped” out. But really, it’s not surprising since the initial shortage news knee-capped their business model last week—so in reality, this is just sympathy panic at this point. 

Now despite the price reductions, these GLP-1 drugs remain enormously profitable. (As expected, considering America holds the award for World Champion Belt for Obesity). The appetite-destruction potions have shown unprecedented results for weight loss by decreasing hunger and increasing fullness. Patients typically start with lower doses and increase over time—a perfect subscription model that keeps revenue flowing month after month.

Novo Nordisk

(Source: CNBC) 

Novo finally decided $650 was maybe a bit steep for its miracle slimming shot, but let's not pretend this price war is about consumer welfare. Wall Street's reaction tells the true story—investors love watching two dominant players control access to the hottest drug class in decades while regulators shut down their cheaper competition.

In the end, the $499 monthly price tag still represents pure profit for Novo and Lilly. Meanwhile, Americans desperate to lose weight will simply have to decide: food or Wegovy? Many will choose the latter. Meaning, keep your eyes on Novo and place your bets accordingly. And as always, stay safe and stay frosty, friends! Until next time… 

Novo Nordisk

P.S. $1.4 million, $1.02 million, and $6.715 million—these aren’t lottery winnings or Miami real estate prices… they’re all insider transactions that have gone down in the last 72 hours while retail investors were busy panic-selling everything. Want to track these corporate fat cats in real-time so you can pretend you're also an executive with material nonpublic information? (Legally, of course.) Click here to join Stocks.News premium while you still can…

Stocks.News does not hold positions in companies mentioned in the article.